Enter your contact information.
Enter your project information.
Step 3Choose the PHP programmers you want to hire.
Compare Free PHP Quotes
WebKit Isn’t Breaking the Web. You Are
*Attention PHP Programmers* - Add A Free Listing! Get more clients.

WebKit may seem like the only game in town, but it's not. Photo: Ariel Zambelich/Wired.com
It sounds like something from a galaxy far, far away, but in truth it was not that long ago that the web was littered with sites that proudly proclaimed “works best in Internet Explorer.” Thankfully those days are over. IE6 no longer dominates the web.
But, while IE6 may be a thing of the past, the root problem — websites that work in one and only one web browser — sadly, remains.
This time the culprit is WebKit, the rendering engine that powers the browsers on the iPhone, iPad and Android phones. But what’s different about this round of monoculture is that, unlike IE 6, the WebKit developers haven’t done anything wrong. It’s web developers that have created the WebKit-only web.
Instead of writing code that will work in any browser, which might mean adding an extra three lines of code to their CSS rules, some of even the largest sites on the web are coding exclusively for WebKit.
The problem is bad enough that on Monday at the CSS Working Group meeting, Microsoft, Mozilla and Opera announced that each are planning to add support for some -webkit prefixed CSS properties. In other words, because web developers are using only the -webkit prefix, other browsers must either add support for -webkit or risk being seen as less capable browsers even when they aren’t.
The danger is that if other browsers implement -webkit prefixes then the entire CSS standards effort will be broken. Instead of coding against a single CSS specification developers will need to code against changing vendor prefixes. As CSS Working Group co-chair, Daniel Glazman, says, “I don’t think this is the right way. And this is the first time in this WG that we are proposing to do things that are not the right way.”
Vendor prefixes like -webkit and -moz were designed to help web developers by allowing browser makers to implement CSS features before the official standard was published. Prefixes were intended to help speed up the process of adding new features to the web and, used properly, they have worked. Unfortunately they’ve also been widely abused.
WebKit is currently the dominant mobile browser in the mind of most web developers (that Opera is actually the single most widely used mobile browser). But even the perceived dominance of WebKit is not the real problem. The problem is — just as it was last time — that web developers are developing exclusively for WebKit.
To be clear, Firefox, IE and Opera also support these features. In most cases, the -webkit properties being used have -moz, -ms and -o prefix equivalents for use in the respective browsers. Popular CSS 3 features like border-radius, transforms, gradients and animations work in all modern browsers. Developers simply need to add those three additional lines of code to make their websites compatible with Firefox, IE and Opera. But they aren’t doing that.
That the problem lies with web developers, not the browsers, led Glazman, to put out a call for action, asking web developers to “stop designing web sites for WebKit only, in particular when adding support for other browsers is only a matter of adding a few extra prefixed CSS properties.”
Neither Glazman, nor anyone else is suggesting that Apple and Google should stop innovating or stop implementing new features as fast as they can. As Tantek Çelik, a Mozilla representative in the CSS WG, says in the minutes of Monday’s meeting, “I think it’s great that Apple wants to innovate as fast as they can…. I don’t want Apple to slow down in innovation and implementing new things. That helps the Web grow and innovate.”
At the same time both Apple and Google have set some bad examples by building a number of WebKit-only demos that might be part of what lead some developers to conclude that only WebKit supports such features. That has also spilled over into the world of tutorials where even sometimes even standards advocates showcase -webkit in their sample code while ignoring -moz-, -ms- and -o-*.
What makes the current -webkit-only epidemic all the more depressing is how easy it is to solve — just use prefixes they way they were intended. Thanks to modern toolkits you don’t even need to write any extra code. Preprocessors like SASS and LESS make it easy to output five lines of prefixed code with a single mixin. Not a fan or SASS or LESS? No problem, just use cssprefixer, which parses your CSS and adds any prefixes you need before you publish it to the web (there’s also a client-side auto-prefixing solution if you prefer).
That’s fine for your website, but what about all the rest of those top 30,000 sites you don’t control? Well, you could email the developers, let them know that their site isn’t working in the most popular mobile web browser; let them know that you can’t use their service. If you’re a programmer or web developer you can help out with Mozilla developer Christian Hellman’s effort to Pre-fix the web. Pre-fix the web is looking for developers willing to seek out projects on Github that only work in Webkit and then fork the project, adding the missing prefixes to the CSS, extending JS code to do proper feature detection and then sending a pull request. In other words, literally fixing the web.
We at Webmonkey hope it’s obvious that building WebKit-only sites is a waste of time. If you’re only interested in iOS users then take a tip from Instagram and build a native app. As Peter Linss, Hewlett-Packard’s CSS WG representative says the CSS WG minutes, “there’s no advantage to the Web to have someone write a platform-specific website.” There’s also no real advantage for the developer, especially when an automated prefixer can do all the work for you. If you want your site to embrace the web, take the time to learn the craft and embrace all of the web. Be good at what you do and do it right.
Source http://www.webmonkey.com/?p=54277Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:42:55 GMT
Tags: CSS, internet explorer, Web Standards, Webkit,
*Attention PHP Programmers* - Add A Free Listing! Get more clients.
CSS
The Future of CSS: Finally, Sane Layout Tools
Woolly, the CSS sheep. HTML5 and CSS 3 offer web designers new semantic tags, fancy animations, server-side fonts and much more, but that’s not the end of the story. The next major development in web design will likely revolve around one of the thi
Quickly Create CSS 3 Animations with ‘Ceaser’
CSS 3 has some awesome new animation capabilities for web developers — rotating objects, fading them in and out and more — but writing the code is a bit more complicated than most CSS rules. To make your animating job a bit easier, developer M
Simplify Your Stylesheets With CSSPrefixer
Woolly, the CSS sheep. CSS 3 has some awesome new features, like 3D transforms, smooth transitions, border images and gradients. Since most browsers already support these features there’s no reason you can’t use them today, provided you grac
internet explorer
A Guide to CSS Hacks for Internet Explorer
Woolly, the CSS sheep. Internet Explorer. That’s all you really need to say to raise a web designer’s blood pressure. And yes, we know IE is improving, but there are still plenty of users stuck on IE 8 and IE 7 (even IE 6) and you can’t
The End of an Era: Internet Explorer Drops Below 50 Percent of Web Usage
Internet Explorer's dominance is coming to an end. Thanks to the rise of mobile and tablet browsing, where IE is noticeably absent, Microsoft's once mighty web browser is now used by less than half of the web.
End of an Era? Chrome Surpasses Firefox
Last month Google's Chrome web browser narrowly beat out Mozilla Firefox to take the number two spot worldwide behind the most used browser on the web: Internet Explorer. November also saw Chrome use surge ahead of Firefox for the first time among Wired.
Web Standards
HTML5 for Web Developers
If you’ve ever tried to wrestled your way through the complexities of the HTML5 specification, we’ve got good news — there’s now a “web developer edition.” The main HTML5 spec can be overwhelming for web developers tryi
Microsoft, Mozilla Battle Over What Makes a ‘Modern’ Web Browser
Microsoft and Mozilla are trading barbs over the coming Internet Explorer 9. Microsoft has been touting its HTML5 support in IE9, claiming that it renders HTML5 better than Firefox (and Chrome, Safari and Opera). Mozilla then turned around and released an
HTML5 Will Be Done in 2014, What Comes Next?
Web developers were given a green light Monday to start using HTML5. Even though many are already using the still-unfinished language to code complicated web apps, the web’s governing body made the transition official by announcing that HTML5 will b
Let Hamilton Arts assist you with your web design needs. We can assure you that our design will not only impress but also work within your budget.
Mesa, Arizona US
Specializes in all aspects of Software Engineering such as Web Design/Developments, Software Developments, Database Administrations, Graphics Designs and so on
Lagos, Lagos NG
Web Design, Implementation, and Maintenance. PHP, Javascript, JQuery, MySql
Daphne, Alabama US
Amazon S3 Storage Now Handles Entire Websites
Cheap, cloud-hosted web servers are a key component of a distributed web. But sometimes you don̵
Why Wait for Google? Use Encrypted Search Today
The beta version of Google Chrome is now selectively redirecting users to Google's encrypted search
Calling All Nashville Web Designers/Developers
We are looking for a couple highly motivated web developers and designers to join us full-time in th
Google Works on Internet Standards with TCP Proposals, SPDY Standardization
In an effort to speed up the web, Google is proposing a number of changes to the standards at the co
Stop Typekit Fonts From Slowing Down Your Site
That’s a fancy-lookin’ T you got there. Typekit is one of the easiest ways to get fancy
Article Tags
PHP Programmers Articles
Live Help Chat Software
Web Design Quote
Web Design